I am often asked to draft or review software license agreements. Some are basic and some are more complex. What is surprising to me is the willingness in the market to turn to a legal expert named “Google” to search for sample contracts and sample license language. Then the company includes what they find in the deal without thinking very hard about whether the language fits the deal in the first place.
The peril of such behavior is not only that the license chosen may be unfit for the deal but also that the company granting the license could inadvertently be granting certain rights it does not intend to grant — and could even be transferring intellectual property rights — without even knowing it.
So, let’s tackle the issue from scratch. What is a software license? It is an agreement where the licensor gives to the licensee the right to use intellectual property rights that protect the software. Software licenses are copyright licenses.
What is a good example of a copyright in software? Code. Copyrights are protected by federal law and give the holder of the copyright exclusive rights to reproduce, modify, distribute, publicly perform, and publicly display. Anyone who intends to use someone else’s software needs permission to engage in any of those activities.
In thinking about your software deal, what types of rights do you need to grant to your customer? The answer ultimately lies in the following question: What does the licensee need? In other words, the type of license really depends on what your customer will be doing with the software. Your customer will be able to do what you allow it to do with the software.
Software licenses come in many shapes and forms, and while there are standard clauses that will work in a variety of deals, the structure and goal of each licensing deal needs to be analyzed with the goal of giving the customer what it needs while protecting ownership in the intellectual property.
For instance, in a standard end-user software license, the licensee needs reproduction and use rights, but does not need distribution rights. Compare that with a “reseller” scenario, in which the customer will be distributing the software to third parties. In the reseller scenario, the licensee usually needs use, reproduction and distribution rights. Nonetheless, I often see license agreements with the wrong terms and the wrong license rights.
One of the most common licensing misconceptions involves software as a service (SaaS) deals. A SaaS deal does not call for a copyright license at all because in that type of deal the customer is not “downloading” anything on their computer. Rather, in a SaaS deal the customer accesses the software via the internet. In other words, the customer is not copying any software, it is simply accessing it over the internet. It is a service. In a SaaS deal, therefore, the customer needs permission to access the website, not a grant of copyright rights.
On the other side of the spectrum is the software development deal. A software development deal involves a completely different scenario because in a software development deal the copyright is created as the code is written. In a software development deal the question is: Who will own rights to the software? The vendor (the one sitting down and typing code and who is the original author) or the master (the one paying the vendor to write the code)? The answer is that the parties can negotiate that in the contract, and proper terminology must be used to properly effectuate the desired intent of the parties.
The above are just a few examples of different ways in which software can be negotiated and in which licenses can shape a software deal. But there are additional terms that are equally important. Once the copyright rights have been granted (or the deal has been shaped), the contract must also address certain license “scope” terms, such as exclusivity, territory, duration, revocability, payment, transferability, and use restrictions, such as seats, installations, or users. Each one of those terms must be carefully crafted to ensure that the parties’ expectations are clearly defined in the contract. Failure to carefully write those terms can result in a deal that does not reflect the verbal agreements.
Unfortunately, there are probably thousands of contracts out there that grant the wrong type of license and that use incorrect terminology and structure in the deal. Often times, the only way in which parties find out about the weaknesses in the contracts is in litigation, when it is too late to fix the problem. The best advice is to stay away from copying or recycling agreements that you find on the internet.
“ The Smith Law Group is very responsive and goes the extra mile in getting work done timely. Gabriela and her associates are thorough and very organized. We have used them on several small projects relating to organizational documents and letters, but we were also very pleased with a recent sale transaction Gabriela advised us on that took a lot of review and updating in a compressed timeframe. We were successful in getting the sale documents in order, and highly recommend this firm for corporate work. ”
“ When we were looking for an international lawyer in the United States, we were told to reach out to Gabriela Smith. Gabriela very quickly and diligently started working on our international negotiation, and she achieved the outcome we wanted. Working with Gabriela turned a very difficult situation into a simpler deal. We recommend The Smith Law Group. / Cuando buscabamos un abogado internacional en Estados Unidos, nos recomendaron a Gabriela Smith. Gabriela inmediata y diligentemente represento a nuestra empresa en una negociacion internacional y logro el resultado que buscabamos en el caso. Trabajar con Gabriela hizo que una situacion dificil se vuelva en un problema menos para nosotros. We recommend The Smith Law Group. ”
“ We have been working with Gabriela for the last year and she has been really helpful in
helping us coordinate and organize the global structure of our companies and with international compliance matters by being proactive, responsive and fully dedicated. ”
“ I own a minority certified small business and was looking for an attorney who was not only an expert in their field, but also someone who genuinely cared about my small business. I found The Smith Law Group and was thrilled that they represent big and small companies and give them all the attention they deserve. The Smith Law Group helped my business with the first agreements that we signed for some big projects. We are thankful for their commitment to us and recommend their services. ”
“ The Smith Law Group no es un estudio jurídico más. Es un grupo de abogados dinámicos y que realmente entiende sobre negocios y las prioridades de los ejecutivos de empresas. Se hacen parte de la empresa y le ponen sumo interés a los asuntos y al éxito de sus clientes. The Smith Law Group es de confianza y es nuestro abogado de referencia desde hace muchos años.
The Smith Law Group is not just another law firm. It is a group of dynamic lawyers who have a profound understanding of business and of the priorities of seasoned executives. They become a part of the team and pay close attention to the matters they handle and care about client success. We trust The Smith Law Group and they have been our law firm for several years ”
“ Gabriela le suma a su know-how y comprensión de los negocios en Estados Unidos y América Latina, una clara vocación de servicio demostrada en su alta disponibilidad y profesionalismo. Por lo cual interactuar con ella se hace muy sencillo. Recomiendo a Gabriela Smith para asuntos cross-border de alta complejidad.
In addition to her know-how and the added value of understanding business in the United States and Latin America, Gabriela loves to serve her clients, which is something she has demonstrated in her ability to respond quickly and in her professionalism. Thus, it is very easy to interact with her. I recommend Gabriela Smith for complex cross-border matters. ”
“ The Smith Law Group was recommended to us by EHR industry leaders. Gabriela is our go-to attorney for complex software licensing deals and has successfully drafted and negotiated these deals. She is extremely responsive and diligent with our requests and has profound knowledge and understanding of our industry. She takes the time to understand what we need and really cares about our work, products, and services. ”
“ The Smith Law Group es uno de mis proveedores preferidos. La confianza de poder delegar tareas o consultas especificas en un outside counsel sabiendo que todo se va a ejecutar y resolver de manera eficiente, rápida y con un nivel de calidad first class, es fundamental para un área de legales interno. El nivel de personalización en la atención por parte de sus profesionales, y la agilidad para trabajar ajustado a los procesos internos de nuestra compañía ha sido un agregado de valor enorme para las operaciones del área que dirijo. Definitivamente un asset valioso
The Smith Law Group is one of my favorite providers. The trust generated in being able to delegate tasks or specific consultations to an outside counsel knowing that everything will get done and resolved in an efficient and timely manner, and with “first class,” is fundamental for an in-house attorney. The level of personalization in the performance of work by these attorneys, and the agility to work while also adjusting to our company’s internal process has been an added-value to the work I perform. The Smith Law Group is definitely a valuable asset. ”
“ CMP has worked with The Smith Law Group for five years on a variety of corporate legal issues – from acquisition and contract to Human Resource issues. We have always found them to be responsive, professional and provide pragmatic and insightful legal advice. Their legal services are the best I have experienced. I highly recommend The Smith Law Group. ”